Lawmakers Accuse SEC’s Gensler of ‘Unethical’ Crypto Case

2 views 4:36 am 0 Comments February 16, 2024

.post-author {
position: relative;
padding-bottom: 0px;
height: 28px;
}
.author-image {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
left: -60px;
width: 100%;
border-radius: 0%;
cursor: pointer;
}
@media only screen and (max-width: 600px) {
.img {
position: absolute;
left: 20%;
width: 250px;
height: 200px;
}
.author-image {
left: 0px;
width: 100%;
}
.code-block .container {
padding: 0px;
}
.post-author {
margin-bottom: 0;
}
}

Top 5 Tokens to Pump in 2024

Lawmakers question SEC’s Gensler over Unethical Crypto Case

Republican legislators wrote to the SEC chairman, claiming that the agency’s misrepresentation of evidence against DEBT Box throws doubt on its prior enforcement actions.
Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee, which supervises the Securities and Exchange Commission, have criticized the agency.
The government has stated that it is working to improve its enforcement processes, which resulted in errors in a court case against a cryptocurrency business regarding an unethical crypto case, but legislators are concerned about the implications for other current cases.

Lawmakers Accuse SEC’s Gensler and Several Republican Senators stated in a letter to Chair Gary Gensler.  The letter states that the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s admission has falsified evidence in a case against the blockchain project DEBT Box calls into question the agency’s overall enforcement methods.

The commission’s attorneys misstated material in court and then neglected to rectify themselves in claims against Digital Licencing Inc., often known as DEBT Box, prompting the court – at the SEC’s Gensler request – to freeze its assets. U.S. District Judge Robert Shelby of the Utah District Court reprimanded the agency’s lawyers, and politicians are heaping on to criticize the regulator.
“Regardless of whether commission staff deliberately misrepresented evidence or unknowingly presented false information, this case suggests that other enforcement cases brought by the commission may be deserving of scrutiny,” the lawmakers argued in the letter, dated February 7 and signed by five senators on the Senate Banking Committee, including J.D. Vance (R-Ohio) and Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.).

“It is unconscionable that any federal agency – especially one regularly involved in highly consequential legal procedures and one that, under your leadership, has often pursued its regulatory mission through enforcement actions rather than rulemakings – could operate in such an unethical and unprofessional manner,” according to the lawmakers who sit on the committee that oversees the securities regulatory body.

The Securities and Exchange Commission, which filed its motion to dismiss last week, pointed out that “agency officials have taken and are taking broader corrective action to ensure the concerns raised by the court do not arise again, including holding mandatory training for all Enforcement Division staff involved in investigations and litigation on the importance of candour and the duty to promptly correct any inaccuracies.”

Join our WhatsApp and Telegram Community to Get Regular Top Tech Updates
Whatsapp Icon
Telegram Icon