Prosecutors in the United States have made the decision not to proceed with a second trial against Sam Bankman-Fried, the co-founder of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX, which has since gone bankrupt. The FTX drama has reached a turning point with this judgment, which comes after the company was found guilty of stealing from clients a month ago. Bankman-Fried was found guilty on all seven counts of fraud and conspiracy on November 2 by a jury. The charges were on the theft of $8 billion from FTX customers. As a result of this conviction, the former billionaire, whose personal wealth had earlier reached a staggering $26 billion, experienced a huge economic setback.

The advantages of a second trial were assessed against the public interest in a speedy conclusion, which was a significant consideration for the prosecution. One of the factors that played a role in the judgment was the fact that Bankman-Fried is slated to be sentenced in March of 2024. It is anticipated that the sentence would include orders of forfeiture and restitution for victims. In addition, the majority of the evidence that may be used in a prospective second trial was previously provided in the first trial, which means that a second trial would be relatively necessary. It is possible that this ruling would speed up the process of providing compensation to those who were affected by the collapse of FTX.

The fall of FTX and Bankman-Fried’s conviction sent shockwaves across the whole world. For example, Temasek Holdings, an investment corporation based in Singapore, has indicated that it would be writing down its investment of $275 million in FTX, regardless of the result of the bankruptcy proceedings. This action brought to light the far-reaching effects that the FTX scandal had on investors and institutions and organizations all around the world. In addition, Temasek and other businesses, including as banks and venture capitalists, were accused of colluding with FTX to deceive investors, which led to the filing of a lawsuit against them.

Bankman-Fried is anticipated to file an appeal of his conviction, despite the fact that he was found guilty. During the course of the trial, he argued that despite the fact that he committed operational errors at FTX, such as failing to form a risk management team, he did not knowingly steal monies from customers. In addition, he was under the impression that it was OK for his hedge fund, Alameda Research, to borrow money from FTX. He did not become aware of the fragile position of their finances until only a few moments before the collapse.